Cruyff Copyright: keeping a football hero from the public
Prof. of intellectual property law Dirk Visser ++The proposalRead this article on ipkitten for an English overview of his proposal or this Dutch post in ie-forum.nl by Prof. Visser. to update the Dutch Copyright Act to include a special provision for the recently deceased Johan Cruyff. I initially thought that this was an April Fools’ joke, however it seems to be a serious proposal by the professor (who also happens to be a die-hard football supporter). With his proposal, Prof. Visser wants to honour the legacy of Johan Cruyff by requiring ++Fair remunerationTranslated from the Dutch “redelijke vergoeding”. for any for-profit disclosure of the portrait or the name of Johan Cruyff to the Johan Cruyff Foundation in Amsterdam. His proposed article (my own translation):
“The Johan Cruyff Foundation in Amsterdam has a right to fair remuneration for any for-profit disclosure of the portrait or the name of Johan Cruyff, notwithstanding the rights of the heirs in accordance with Article 25a and subject to the rights of third parties. The use of the work of Johan Cruyff, or the portrait or the name of Johan Cruyff as a distinctive sign must be authorised by the Johan Cruyff Foundation, Amsterdam.”
Johan Cruyff joins Peter Pan
The proposal takes precedence from similar legislation in the UK, where the work ‘Peter Pan’ by Sir James Matthew Barrie has gained a special place in their copyright act (article 301). Pursuant to the article, royalties have to be paid to the Hospital for Sick Children in London ++In other wordsThis is legalese for “you cannot use the work without permission”.
Such work or author-specific legislation leads to a decrease of legal certainty, and an increase in difficulty ++OutOfCopyright.euTake a look at OutOfCopyright.eu for more information about why it is important to know the public domain status of a work. The flowcharts (see below) of OutOfCopyright.eu illustrate the unnecessary complexity of public domain-status determination when these special provisions are made into law., as well as a barrierWork or author-specific legislation leads to a decrease of legal certainty, and an increase in difficulty to determine the public domain status of a work, as well as a barrier to reuse of the work. to reuse of the work. The UK article diminished legal certainty for copyright in the UK and will, until revoked, be at odds with the situation in the rest of Europe.
The Johan Cruyff Foundation has a charitable mission to get children active. The foundation does important work by organising projects for disabled children, and equipping playgrounds and primary schools. A mission I wholeheartedly support. However the proposed remuneration to this foundation when using the name or portrait of Johan Cruyff should never be encoded in intellectual property laws.The proposed remuneration to this foundation when using the name or portrait of Johan Cruyff should never be encoded in intellectual property laws.
A penalty for Cruyff?
“I’ve never seen a bag of money score a goal.” – Johan Cruyff
With every additional requirement on top of copyright, like fair remuneration, a barrier to reuse is created. What is a fair remuneration in this case? These barriers will deter entrepreneurs and creative producers alike. Creating this special provision only harms the legacy of Cruyff in the Netherlands. Whereas for-profit publication with portraits of Cruyff can be created and distributed outside of the Netherlands, within the Netherlands you would have to jump through different hoops. The adoption of this proposal would only serve to hold back imagery of Johan Cruyff and his name in the Netherlands and will therefore only damage his legacy rather than strengthen it or the Johan Cruyff Foundation.
Furthermore this proposal will expropriate the creators of portraits by Cruyff, limiting the options of exploitation and distribution of their work.This proposal will expropriate the creators of portraits by Cruyff, limiting the options of exploitation and distribution of their work. For example, what do we need to do with those portraits that are already shared under an open license that allows commercial reuse? Those that enrich Cruyff’s extensive Wikipedia article for example. How does Prof. Visser imagine that we deal with these images?
“Before I make a mistake, I don’t make that mistake.” – Johan Cruyff
It is not up to the legislator to promote the legacy of Cruyff.It is not up to the legislator to promote the legacy of Cruyff. Prof. Visser should revise his suggestion and should encourage the creators of these portraits to share the material ++Arnoud EngelfrietThe opinion by Mr. Arnoud Engelfriet suffers from the same problems.. Thereby creating the condition to give the most attention possible to Cruyff. This can lead to name recognition, which can subsequently increase ++Please donateMake a donation to the Cruyff Foundation. to the Cruyff Foundation. A memorial coin would also be a good idea to honour Cruyff’s legacy.
Prof. Visser intends to lobby the Dutch ministry of Safety and Justice and our members of parliament to gain support of his proposal. If you agree with Prof. Visser’s view, please ++Mail Prof. VisserAs per his request on ie-forum.nl. at firstname.lastname@example.org, but include me (email@example.com) as well. I look forward to discussing this proposal in detail.