What is your role at your organisation?;Does your organisation contribute content to Wikimedia?;Do you keep statistics on the use of your collection on your institution's website?;Please tells us in what way you keep statistics on your collection. ;Total items in your collection?;Total items that you share with Wikimedia Commons;Percentage of visitors from Wikipedia;Percentage of visitors from Wikimedia Commons;What information do you need?;At what time interval do you need statistics?;What other statistics do you need from you collection on Wikimedia Commons?;Total items in your collection;Do you have any other comments regarding the measurement of use of your collection on Wikimedia Commons?;Please explain why you need this information;On what level do you need statistics for your collection on Wikimedia Commons?;Please explain why you need statistics on these levels?;Please explain why you need statistics on this interval level Project lead;No, but we intend to;Yes;"Regular Google Analytics for our website. Measurement of growth of unique visitors vs. our targets. In addition, I keep detailed statistics for the individual videos hosted by us: video views, page views, usage of vodcasts and the so-called 'engagement data': how long do people view a specific video, how much of the video is played, which videos have higher retention rates...";;0;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website, Information on provenance / demographics of the viewers/users (country, language) + technology used;per day;;300+ videos;"It would be awesome if - the analytics could be integrated with Google Analytics (i.e. provide GA tracking ID, then stats from Wikimedia Commons are also visible on GA) - there would be a shared dashboard for all participating collections, in which we can compare our statistics (see www.museum-analytics.org or http://dashboard.imamuseum.org/ for inspiration) - well-designed, visually attractive stats would be a big plus - the existing statistics dashboard of Wikimedia projects is feature-rich but looks unattractive - would be great to have exporting functionality (PDF, csv, images of graphs) similar to Google Analytics - so that we can send (automated or manually compiled) reports to anyone, e.g. for integration in year reports";All of it is important data that proves the relevance/impact of publishing materials on Wikimedia projects. We can learn from it in terms of how sticky/successful our content is in a certain context.;Object level, Collection level, All uploads, Comparisons with other institutions' donations (see www.museum-analytics.org as an example);Learning about success and impact of content, both for individual objects and the collection as a whole.;Similar to what Google Analytics provides. Wikipedian in Residence;Yes;Yes;"[not known; have asked our web analytics person to contribute]";;~200;;;;per hour;;Over 10 million;;;;; Volunteer for technical issues;No, but we intend to;Yes;As an organization of mostly older volunteers, we are not actually up-to-date in our use of internet venues. This year we have started tracking likes to our Facebook page and visitors to our website. In a more general sense, hits on Wikipedia pages are interesting for subjects directly related to the exhibitions on show, but otherwise, specific stats from Wikimedia are not mission critical.;;12;Sorry, we haven't been able to activiate Google Analytics yet;unknown;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used;per month;We would like to know what the most popular languages are, so that we can minimize our translation efforts.;3000-5000;Sorry it's such a small collection!;"It would be wonderful to have this information, partly to find out what interests Wikipedia readers so we can respond by uploading more of what they are looking for. We do not ""need"" this information (I don't think), but it would be nice to have.";Object level;We are a very small museum, so we cannot fit all of our objects into the space we have. Also, some of the objects are not well described, so it would be helpful if Wikipedia could help us identify what they are. These have not been uploaded yet, because we don't like the fact that we can't state what they are exactly.;We only make collection decisions at the monthly level, and our financial and visitor reports are also at the monthly level. datamanager;No, but we intend to;Yes;"Google analytics and stats of our search engine - number of visitors - origins of vistors - repeated visit? - duration of visit - views per page/item - number of pages - top 10 items - content of queries - number of images downloaded";;no objects yet;-;-;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per day;"Most popular objects What responses do we get on our objects What type of queries/what queries lead to our objects (in future: what do people query so we can see if our information matches their questions. But I am not sure if we can cope with this type of research and rewriting of our information yet)";"1 miljon objects; 300.000 object descritpions online";;"We are interested in all uses of our images and metadata in wikimedia/wikipedia and interested to see if this (also) generates traffic to our website. We are less interested in general stats information of wikipedia (no time to process or deal with this information). But, I would love to be informed about our collection in relation to other collections. How are we doing compared to other Cult. Heritage institutions?";Object level;; Archivist;Yes;No;;;30;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;Unknown -- 130 000 shelf meters of analog archives plus digital records;;To see how the material is used and what kind of traffic it generates.;Object level;We have only uploaded thirty objects so far, so the object level is good enough.;No reason to follow our thirty objects on a day-to-day basis. Project Lead;No;"No ""collection""";;;;;;;per hour;;;;;;; Scientific director and curator of projects;Yes;Yes;"We created templates for all the institutions we involved. The template are added in the discussion page or in the image (on commons) and they contain 1. the license and/or the OTRS ticket, 2. the attribution to the institution (requirement for the cc by-sa license) and 3. a hidden category which allows us to monitor content. We have a working document produced with a programme which monitors content on different linguistic editions and projects and we also produced some information design to elaborate content and make it readable. ";;30000;We do not publish links to our institutions on what we upload;We do not publish links to our institutions on what we upload;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded;per month;It would be useful to acknowledge the work of volunteers: categories added and translations are activities volunteers often do and they have a great value.; uploaded 37,000 images and texts but this content belongs to different GLAMs;Thank you! and good luck with your work. iolanda;"In general when we discuss with institutions they are interested in getting a sense of what is happing. A general overview is what they are looking for. Basically you want to tell them: ""thanks for uploading..."" (number of content uploaded), ""look, so many people have seen your uploads!"" (number of views) and ""look how many volunteers have done a wonderful job in making your content more accessible"" (pages in which your media is used, categories added, translations). ";Object level, All uploads;in general it is useful to give a sense of what happened to things uploaded. but normally we found that few objects receive a wide visibility. for those objects is useful to have better statistics to create case studies.;It provides a sense of how content are used and viewed. I don't think it is necessary to have more frequent statistics. Case study writer;Yes;Not on the website, but on Wikimedia projects;"I am mainly looking for the data provided by tools such as magnus' Glamourous I and II and Prolineserver's Glamorous and Glamorous cats (tracking, image usage, categories, page views, interwiki tracking). ";;over 32,000;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;; helped freeing thousands of items through WikiAfrica and Share Your Knowledge;No, but I do use a private tool to gather more info about Wikipedia articles created or improved within out project.;In order to write case studies, statistics are vital.;Collection level;If given at least on a category basis, it can be useful for both case studies writing and improving usage of the contents.;A smaller interval is not required, month data provide enough details. Project worker;Yes;Yes;"Views per item # pages visited Referral traffic Plays per item Unique views";;1.568 videos,1973 images; 0.87% (97,306); 0.01% (97,306);Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website, Plays of content on Wiki pages, plays of content on Wikimedia pages;per day;;800.000 hours, #items unknown;;;Object level, Collection level, All uploads;;Interesting to see if spikes are related to current events or dissemination activity. Assoc. Prof/Director;No, but we intend to;No;;;0;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per week;;>100,000;;justify resources in loading media;Collection level;; Consultant - Wikipedian in Residense;Yes;Yes;Use the cat search and we arrange it in libraries;;small;1 million extra;zero?;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per week;A tool that allowed any contributor to see how their pictures were used available to any commons user;vast;;Organisations need to justify their involvement in helping us with our mission;Collection level, All uploads;Large projects have muliple partners;We report it weekly Collections Database Manager;Yes;Yes;source and views and total activity (per month and once a year a summary));;1000;8.3;combined total above;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;"http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Tools Also I found that by monitoring the source (Google, Wikipedia, Europeana, yahoo, etc) of access to OUR site using Google analytics I gained a lot of insight. For example statistics of access to our museum site about Israeli artists: Google 46%, directly from our site 4%, facebook 0.2% Also I would like a better tool to download info from the categories and wiktionary sites Also for your information I think that Europeana will gain greatly by linking their site from the article on the artist to their website. I built (with the help of BGWhite) a template for this purpose that works very well Thank you for doing this!";500000;;"see below but some of these tools exists here: http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Tools what i am most missing is an excel with all the changes to my ""watched pages"" in an excel format on a 4 times a year basis, so i can update my material";Object level, Collection level, All uploads, articles linked to our site;yearly presentation to show how users access our collections;good indication Manager of Museum Information Services;No, but we intend to;Yes;Standard menu of Google Analytics reporting based largely on object-record page views;;none yet!;0.2%;NA;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;24000;Thanks for doing this! As we look towards contributing a modest number of images sometime in 2013 (as soon as internal resources allow), it's great to know that you're working on this. --Rob;All listed metrics would be useful for understanding how that planned dissemination path is working.;Object level, Collection level;;"Generally, anything more frequent than monthly would be irrelevant for us, and we'd be most likely to make the most of use of annual numbers; the one non-essential, but intriguing, exception might be the ability to see any daily bumps regarding images of objects that are related in some way to exhibition openings, artists in the news, or more general new items out in the world." Teacher;Yes;No;Mostly pageviewsasthisistheeasiest to do;;400;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;;;Formetoconinute to convince the need to add more content;;; project consultant;Yes;Yes;"Unique visitors Page Views Most visited pages Trafic Source Language & Countries";;5055;3,0 % from referral traffic is related to Wikipedia (referral visits is about 31% of the total visits);1,0 % from referral traffic is related to Wikimedia Commons (referral visits is about 31% of the total visits);Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;If possible, the re-use from the data on Wikimedia on other domains outside Wikipedia. Is data downloaded? ;Billions (1.5 million photographs, 300.000 maps, 1.000.000 index records & 6500 archives within eacht archive at least 500 to 1000 inventory numbers);;The distribution of our data and content is changing, we tend to focus more on platforms outside our traditional domains (on-site and own website). We, however, need to report en document what the impact of this development is. If the broad public is for example visiting our building on-site less, is there an increase visible for example on our own site and even more on domains like Wikipedia or Flickr or perhaps social media domains like facebook, pinterest, twitter or blogs.;Object level, Collection level, All uploads;We try to anticipate on the changing field of data an the spread of it. Its a new area for us, looking more outside our traditional domains. The more statistical data we can collect an get out of these initiatives the better we can create a proper image of these new developments ;Our accountability runs on a monthly base senior Online and Digital Media;No, but we intend to;Yes;"Number of collection pages visited, Numer of on site searches";;negligible;1.84;0.01;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per quarter;;49000;;"to inform the organization ";Object level;; Photographer;No, but we intend to;Yes;;;;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;Other media that show the same artwork?;80000;;I'd like to be able to reinforce the idea that sharing images on Wikimedia will lead to more traffic for our museum.;Object level;I want to see which media are being used, and how much.;I bet we'll only look at the stats occasionally. Visual Resources Librarian;No, but we intend to;unsure;;;;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per quarter;;84280;;These strike me as the type of data we would need to demonstrate the utility of sharing our media with Wikipedia/Wikimedia projects to upper level administration and museum trustees.;Object level;Object level statistics would help us to identify which works in our collection particularly connect with Wikipedia/Wikimedia audiences. ;quarterly (or monthly) statistics would mesh well with project reporting structures already in place in our institution. I fear that more frequent reporting could be overwhelming. policy advisor;No, but we intend to;No;"we don't specifically for use of collection we do for general use of website (all usual google analytics stats), including visits to catalogue-searching ";;0;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages;per month;;40;;;Object level, Collection level;"object level would give valuable information about popularity/use of parts of our collection collection level would be usefull in order to compare with similar collections and usage.";"per month would allow detection of 'seasonal' peaks finer unit would probably not be usefull for expected usage " Projectleader;Yes;Yes;"Number of visitors ";;50;Not known;Not known;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website, Number of views of the actual images on commons;per month;"Geographic devision wuth regards to the usage of images. Not only the number of changes that are made to description files, but also the changes itself for us to use or refer to. ";650.000 items;;;Object level;To keep track of usage and change of descriptions. Both equally important. ; Manager of Web and Social Media;Yes;Yes;We use Google Analytivs;;approx. 20,000 images;0.658364713359269;0.209464752279807;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;a list of media that has been uploaded, but which has not yet been integrated into an article would be useful for determining how to do that integration.;approximately 30,000 objects;;"The museum's board of directors expects a bimonthly report of online audience behavior. Our website, social media accounts and other online presences provide comparable data, but to date the Magnus' tools available on the toolserver have proven to be unreliable. They're a great start, but not yet ready for board-level reporting. You can't give ""sometimes"" information to a board of directors. Either the information is available or it isn't. This is something that would definitely improve our ability to defend the decision to contribute. ";Object level, Collection level, All uploads;"The museum's board of directors expects a bimonthly report of online audience behavior. Our website, social media accounts and other online presences provide comparable data, but to date the Magnus' tools available on the toolserver have proven to be unreliable. They're a great start, but not yet ready for board-level reporting. You can't give ""sometimes"" information to a board of directors. Either the information is available or it isn't. This is something that would definitely improve our ability to defend the decision to contribute. ";our quarterly reports include monthly statistics. Documentary;Yes;No;;;;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Referrers to Wikipedia pages;per day;;;;;Collection level;; Community Manager;No;No;;;0;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files;per month;;4.5;;;Object level, Collection level;;To be included in our monthly tracking statistics webmaster;Yes;No;;;200;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;2 millions;;"to make a case for ""opening"" content to institution hierarchy. showing that content is well spread and visible and that's it's more valuable than keeping marterial closed for a futur hypothetic book publishing ";Object level, Collection level;to learn back what is interesting to wikipedia users; cultural communication coordinator;No, but we intend to;soon we'll have them;Views per item, we're trying to introduce contents from our local place: heritage, nature, sports and economial items;;4;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per week;;4;;For us wikipedia is one of the most important fonts/sources from users and our staying is primordial;Object level;; Director of Documentation Center and Performing Arts Museum;Yes;Yes;" Number of pages visited Source ";;56;We don't Know;We dont't Know;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;None;300;No;"Because we want to know the impact that uploading images can cause to our institution. By uploading pictures to WikiCommons, we expect to be more known around the world ";Object level, Collection level, All uploads;Because of the same reasons explained above.;Because it's not very important for us to known the statistics per week or day. Librarian;No, but we intend to;Yes;Source, Visits, views per item, pages/items most visited,...;;10;0.48%;0.04%;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;310.000 maps aprox;;;All uploads;; International Dunhuang Project (Designer/Tech Manager);Yes;Yes;[redacted for privacy concerns];;106;6% (one month);0.06% (one month);Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;100,000+ (specific Collections only);;;Object level;; Head of the Web;No, but we intend to;Yes;We look for the views per item, the most visited works and referal sources. But this is not giving us relevant information. We are improving our stats analysis to align it to the recommendations of the Culture 24 report.;;1;5%;5 visits per year (2012);;per hour;;4600;I'm sorry to not be able to provide more information, but as you have seen, our relation with Wikimedia is still weak.;;;; Administrative;Yes;;"We are not a Museum, we are a Foundation and we has a Library and a Documentation Center, we promote intangible heritage. We own 5.000 books that the writter Josep Pla donates in 1973 (and more than 1000 about him), 2000 photographs from the writter, etc. In our website we have published the biography of Josep Pla, that is the most visited page.";;27;5%;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to a Wikimedia page (such as metadata on Commons), Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;;;To analyze in which information people are interested;Object level;;We have little traffic Directions;Yes;Not regularly;We would like to know views, source, where do they come from...;;;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;More tahn 50 images commented;;To follow the onformation related to the Museum and the collections;Object level, Collection level;;Is just to kkep and eye in the evolutions trough the Wikipedia Systems Librarian;No, but we intend to;Yes;views per item, loans per item;;;;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per week;n/a;250000;n/a;To access our content;Collection level;; project manager digitisation;Yes;working on it;The collection database is webhosted by AdLib: we can not keep statistics on the use of inidividual items, but we do keep statics of the number of users of the page in general. ;;c.100?;?;?;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Number of views of your media that are on other Wikimedia projects, Number of Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages in which your media is used, Overview of items that you've uploaded, Overview of the number of changes that are made to the descriptions of files, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;c 210.000;;Useful to known which items are popular i.e. which categories are less represented on Wikimedia Commons (fossils, minerals). We then have an indication for further cooperation.;Object level, Collection level;See above; communication;Yes;Yes;"Source visitors number of pages visited";;;63.24%;;Number of views of Wikipedia articles that include your media, Referrers to Wikipedia pages, Number of click throughs from a Wikipedia page to your institutions website;per month;;more than 10.000;;To keep working in one way: use wikipedia as a referral, work together with wikipedia to update our content, and provide our audiences quality content.;Collection level;Because we don't need a very detailed statistics, but a general overview;Per month we can analyse the audiences of the Joan Mir� Foundation and visitors of wikipedia following the seasonal terms.It also provides us information about which are the exhibitions that generate more interest.